Cyberattackers are known to strike without warning. There is a good chance that you will lose a lot of money if you wait until they get to you. You will stay several steps ahead of these adversaries if you take the initiative to look for threats and address them before they gain momentum.
Though threat hunting is a good way to protect your system from outside intrusion, some misconceptions can make it counterproductive. Here are some examples.
You Don’t Need To Be An Expert To Perform Threat Hunting
Anyone who has a gun can go out into the forest to hunt for animals. Yet, there’s a high opportunity they’ll return with nothing since they come up short on abilities to point and shoot their prey. The same thing applies to digital threathunting. Anybody with IT abilities might have fundamental information on threathunting, however when it comes down to center abilities and using the right instruments, they might be restricted.
Advanced threat intelligence and monitoring abilities, as well as an eye for spotting weaknesses, make the best threat hunters. They know how to deal with a variety of threats and can identify them. Furnished with the right devices, they take advantage of their time and assets, focusing on dangers to keep away from weakness.
The Main Focus of Threat Hunting Is On Attacks
A lot of people think that threat hunting is just about the action, which means constantly chasing down and fighting off threat actors. Although that is an essential component, understanding the digital environment’s security state typically requires extensive information gathering, observation, and investigation.
Traditional hunters don’t just go hunting. They plan, laying out which areas to concentrate on and the most effective methods for luring and killing their prey. Along these lines, a digital threat tracker fosters a pre-hunting plan which centers around exploring and arranging before making a move. They also make a post-hunting plan where they record their findings after the main hunt.
Threat Hunting Is A Precautionary Measure
People frequently mistake threat hunting for a prevention strategy because it is a proactive security activity that takes place before cyberattacks. However, this is not the case. Policies, procedures, and tools that you use to prevent threats from entering your system are called preventive security measures. On the other hand, threat hunting is about removing threats that have already entered your network.
Threat hunting is preceded by preventative security measures. In any event, when you have solid protections, your framework can become defenseless — this is known as lingering gambles. Despite the security measures in place, threat hunting helps identify the remaining risks in your network.
AI Can Replace Human Effort While Threat Hunting
There is a common misconception that artificial intelligence (AI) can take the place of humans in threat hunting; however, this is still a theoretical notion and is not applicable in practice. Even though AI systems are capable of recognizing certain behavioral patterns in threat actors, these patterns shift over time as attackers constantly develop new strategies. To detect even the tiniest details that cannot be programmed into an AI system, threat hunting requires human intervention.
Threat hunting is improved when AI and human input are combined. The devices can create intel that people will research further to acquire bits of knowledge about dangerous entertainers. Sending moment cautions and warnings are likewise key jobs that artificial intelligence programming can play in overseeing weaknesses.
Both Threat Hunting and Penetration Testing Are the Same Concepts
For this, we have to draw a comparison, of threat hunting vs penetration testing. Threat hunting and penetration testing both find vulnerabilities in the same way, but they are not the same thing. In entrance testing, you wear the shoes of a cybercriminal to perform moral hacking on your framework, so you can recognize its shortcomings, and afterward resolve them.
Even if your pen testing is thorough, you might overlook some hidden threats. You can use threat hunting to find any remaining system vulnerabilities rather than carrying out the test multiple times at once. Combining the two methods further enhances your safety.
Conclusion
From a vantage point, you can use threat hunting as a defense strategy. Because you do it in advance, you can take your time and be specific and clear. With this method, you can test your defenses to make sure they are up to par and find the tiniest flaws.
About Author
